Deceptive Advertising Expert Witnesses

Los Angeles, California

Marketing, Advertising - Survey research, Intellectual property, Lanham Act, Trademark infringement, Trade dress infringement, Likelihood of confusion, False advertising, Deceptive advertising, Secondary meaning, Genericness, Dilution

Lucas Carden, Ph.D., is a research scientist and managing partner at FocusMark LLC and serves as a testifying survey expert on matters related to trademark and trade dress infringement and false and deceptive advertising. He has over a decade of experience designing, executing, and evaluating consumer surveys for complex litigation matters, corporate market research, and academic research. Dr. Carden has been retained as a survey expert in multiple litigation matters before United States District Courts. He has experience supporting other litigation survey experts, as well as conducting survey research and preparing rebuttal critiques in disputes regarding likelihood of confusion, secondary meaning, genericness, false and deceptive advertising, materiality, and patent valuation. His litigation experience includes matters before federal and state courts, the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB), and the National Advertising Division (NAD). Beyond litigation, Dr. Carden has con...

Baltimore, Maryland

Marketing, Advertising - Survey research, consumer behavior, consumer confusion, deceptive advertising, trademark, trade-dress and genericness, Lanham Act, FTC, class-action litigation

Federal and State qualified advertising, marketing and survey research expert representing plaintiff and defendant clients in advertising and trademark litigation matters. Designed over 700 surveys related to advertising, trademark trade dress and genericness areas for plaintiff and defendant clients. Former Director of Impact Evaluation in FTC's Bureau of Consumer Protection. Expert in design and implementation of on-line and internet panel surveys. Author of journal articles on "Guidelines for On-Line Surveys in Litigation," "Comparison of Mall and On-Line Surveys in Litigation."

Burlington, Massachusetts

Marketing, Advertising - Survey research, Intellectual property, Lanham Act, Trademark infringement, Trade dress infringement, Likelihood of confusion, Secondary meaning, Genericness, Dilution, False advertising, Deceptive advertising, Class action

Amanda T. Bulian is a senior manager at Applied Marketing Science, Inc. (AMS) and serves as a testifying survey expert on matters related to intellectual property, false and deceptive advertising, and class actions. At AMS, she provides expert research consultation and rebuttal critiques for consumer survey evidence in federal and state civil litigation matters and cases brought to the National Advertising Division (NAD). She has comprehensive experience designing and executing consumer surveys for matters involving trademark and trade dress likelihood of confusion, secondary meaning, and genericness, as well as surveys assessing consumer perceptions and materiality of allegedly deceptive advertising and marketing claims. Amanda’s expert services include survey design, data collection, experimental data analysis, expert report preparation, critiques of opposing expert reports, expert testimony, and guidance on the deposition and trial questioning of opposing expert witnesses. S...

Oak Harbor, Washington

Marketing, Advertising - survey, brand, sales, trademark, misleading, trade secret, deceptive advertising, commercial best efforts, pharma, technology, retail, cpg, digital advertising, relationships, reasonable best efforts, beverage, eveready, loyalty, privacy, squirt

Robert W. Palmatier is the John C. Narver Endowed Chair in Business Administration and Tenured Professor of Marketing at the University of Washington's Foster School of Business. He is the founder and Research Director of the SAMS Institute (Sales and Marketing Strategy Institute), a global organization linking business and academics to generate knowledge in sales and marketing strategy. Professor Palmatier is the past Editor of both the Journal of Marketing (2018–2022) and the Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science (2015–2018) — consistently ranked among the top four highest-impact marketing journals globally. In those roles, he evaluated and made final publication decisions on thousands of peer-reviewed submissions, giving him unmatched insight into marketing research standards, methodology, and survey design. He has been recognized as the 6th most productive marketing scholar globally based on publications in premier marketing journals (2013–2022), ranked in the top 1% of ...