Patent Invalidity Expert Witnesses

Fayetteville, Arkansas

Medical Devices, Biomedical Engineering - Biomedical Engineering, Medical Engineering, Biomechanics, Medical Equipment, Intellectual Property (IP), Patent Infringement, Inter Partes Review (IPR), Patent Invalidity, Surgery, Medical Malpractice, Medical Instrument, Prosthetic Device, Medical Device, Blood, Medical Electronics, Device Failure

Dr. Jensen is a Professor of Engineering and has been retained by representation for both plaintiffs and defendants in cases involving medical devices and equipment, including their failure modes, design/manufacturing issues, usage, and IP litigation issues (infringement, invalidity, etc.). He has testified at trials and depositions, and participated in on-site interrogations. Dr. Jensen’s educational background is from top ranked universities at the interface of engineering and medicine. He has more than two decades of academic and industry experience in both Europe and the US. He worked for six years with a global measurement, automation, and instrumentation provider in the company’s consulting services and business development departments. He has 20 years of faculty member experience at highly renowned universities in Europe and the US, winning numerous prestigious awards for his work with research, teaching, and service. The results from some of his work has been adopted by th...

Gaithersburg, Maryland

Intellectual Property - Administrative Patent Judge, Claim Construction, Post Grant Review, Ex Parte Appeals, PTAB, Patent Eligible Subject Matter, Patent Law, Post Grant Review, Inter Partes Review, Obviousness, Software Patents, Mechanical Devices, Patent Validity, Anticipation, Patent Law, Patents, Patent Invalidity, Indefinteness, Business Method Patents

Amee A. Shah is a former Administrative Patent Judge at the USPTO's Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB), bringing nearly a decade on the bench and over 30 years of combined legal, technical, and patent expertise to her expert witness and litigation support practice. As an APJ, Judge Shah presided over and authored decisions in inter partes review (IPR) proceedings and ex parte appeals across all five PTAB technology areas — business methods, mechanical, electrical, biotechnology, and chemical — spanning technologies including data processing, graphical user interfaces, artificial intelligence, mechanical structures, computer systems, semiconductors, and medical devices. She also served as a PTAB point of contact for patent eligible subject matter under 35 U.S.C. § 101, reviewing and authoring decisions designated as informative guidance and training examiners on USPTO § 101 guidance implementation. Before joining the bench, Judge Shah spent over a decade as a USPTO Primary Examin...